This month saw the release of the new Synthesis Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The previous IPCC assessment, back in 2007, was a key piece of evidence in setting the UK’s 2050 target to cut national emissions by at least 80% below what they were in 1990. So it makes sense to take stock and see if that evidence has changed.
The IPCC produces the most in-depth global summaries we have of the science of climate change, its impacts and options for addressing them. The 40-page Synthesis distils the 5,000 pages of three underlying IPCC assessments, the work of over 800 scientists across the world. There is even a two-page summary of the Synthesis for those in a hurry.
So what has changed? In many respects the headline conclusions remain the same:
- Since the 1950s the world has warmed, with many changes unprecedented over decades to millennia.
- The dominant cause has been emissions into the atmosphere from human activities, principally fossil-fuel burning.
- Impacts are already being seen across the world, and continued warming increases the likelihood of severe, widespread and irreversible results.
- Minimising – but not eliminating – impacts requires a combination of cutting greenhouse gas emissions (mitigation) and adjusting to the changing climate (adaptation).
However, seven more years of research means there is even more certainty in these conclusions and much more detail behind them. Plus there are a few new ones, especially relevant to the UK’s 2050 target:
- Limiting global temperature will require a limit to total carbon dioxide emissions, meaning we ultimately need to reach a zero-carbon world, not just a low-carbon one.
- Limiting warming specifically to 2°C requires zero emissions – perhaps even net removal of carbon dioxide – by the end of this century.
- The challenge is substantial, and only increases with delays in mitigation and if key technologies (such as carbon capture and storage) are not available.
2°C is the warming limit to which the UK and over 160 other governments around the world have signed up.
In 2008 the CCC found that a roughly 50:50 chance of staying below 2°C this century would require early peaking of global greenhouse gas emissions, a halving by 2050 and further cuts thereafter.
Dividing these 2050 emissions by the expected number of people gives roughly two tonnes per person. This is 80% lower than the average UK person emitted in 1990. We therefore recommended 80% as the ceiling for UK emissions in 2050, as it is hard to envisage many other countries emitting much less than two tonnes per person by then.
The new IPCC Synthesis has a useful chart (below) summarising the key climate information: risks as a function of global temperature rise, the total carbon dioxide emissions over time consistent with that temperature rise, and the emissions in 2050 consistent with the cost-effective path to meeting that budget.
It shows that a 40-70% global cut below 2010 levels is on the cost-effective path to a likely chance of staying below 2°C. For comparison, the CCC’s global pathway has a 55-60% cut relative to 2010.
So, maintaining the same assumption about a national share, the 2050 UK target still looks appropriate.
Governments will meet again in Paris at the end of 2015 to try and agree on delivering this additional mitigation. No doubt the IPCC line about the risks of delay will be kept in their minds. And for the UK, the legislated UK carbon budgets are designed to reach 2050 in a way that minimises delays and costs.